The nature of the task

 We are humanity, a species divided by those who would subjugate us into atomised consumers hungry for whatever they are selling, atomise us into semi-living machine parts in their all-encompassing system, engineer us into 24/7 on-call guinea pigs for their endless experiments, into creatures free enough to obey their orders precisely. We are to become farm produce, fodder for our rulers’ revulsion and pleasure – as their momentary whims dictate.

That portion of humanity choosing love, truth and free will in defiance of their wannabe overlords are a loose group faced with the seemingly impossible task of becoming an army of love, truth and free will. They are separated from each other by any number of boundaries. They attempt the unprecedented, informed daily that they are domestic terrorists, conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, selfish idiots, right-wing extremists.

That portion of humanity believing such information sees no value in what the army of love are selling. Those that army would liberate into the terrible beauty of their free will do not yearn for victory. Safety is their dream. Defiance is risky, selfish. The anti-socials should listen to the experts, think about other people, follow the science, trust what governments the world over are saying.

The defiant are thus pitched against the very people for whom they fight. Those for whom they fight reject what they are. And yet that army believes the compliant are deceived. But what right do they have to act on that belief? 

This is the nature of the task.

We, all of humanity, built history into today. Today is farce run riot. Today is Clown World, fear frenzy, righteous anger held at fever pitch by rulers hell bent on final dominion, hell bent on perfection, on faultless systems they expertly control. Soon, they sing, soon tragedy and suffering will be phenomena dimly understood from the pages of dull history books. Soon we will be happier than ever. Who can resist such an emancipating programme?

I understand this programme as a satanic process: the ego’s urgent ascent, a usurpation of God by Ego forever foretold by the way things are. It happens always in fitfully expanding spirals. Today it is happening globally, intensely, completely. 

Are we becoming one healthy diversity through this fiery crucible?

Yes, “army” is the wrong word. So are “struggle”, “defiance”, “resistance”, etc. But they are perfect, too. They bring us face to face with each other in exactly the right context to learn that the context itself is the problem. My sense is that we are individually processing – or being processed through – a series of experiences tailor-made – by Self and Other in fractious collaboration – to unearth old wisdoms as new. This process is a struggle because we resist each other. Because we resist, because we form sides to defend and fight for what we love, we co-create the struggle, the difficult lesson that it is precisely this oppositional tension we are here to transcend. It is an intense immersion-therapy session at global-collective scale, experienced uniquely by each of us, one by one. These things takes time.

This is the nature of the task before us. We are the nature of the task before us. I, you, everyone, all of us constitute Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Joe Biden, anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, right-wing extremists … we constitute everyone and everything. We built history into today. Today is our inheritance, now and always. We struggle to feel, to own, our co-responsibility, our power, our beauty. We struggle to learn how to stop struggling, to abandon habits of ideology and belief that blind us to The Now. In clinging to the familiar in blank defiance of history’s corrective lesson, we are taught, painfully, that clinging is the problem. The fuel powering our desperate struggle is fear. When we see that, and learn to let go into what needs to be, everything will change. 

When we love, everything changes. This is the nature of the task before us. It is as simple, intricate and intimate as that.

Go abandon!

“Let’s go Brandon!” – Some journalist misreporting a crowd’s chant somewhere in the US

“Fuck Joe Biden!” – A crowd’s chant somewhere in the US misreported by some journalist

I watched some of the 75th hearing of the Corona Investigative Committee as it aired. Reiner Held presented charts depicting all-cause-mortality data in Germany these last few years, one spanning 2000 to present day, the others depicting 2020 and 2021 against the average of 2015-2019. On the evidence he presented, there was no event of any significance affecting all-cause mortality in any age group in Germany. The only remarkable thing is that 2020 and 2021 show below-average all-cause mortality in all but one age group.

If the official data referenced by the guest to create his charts is accurate, then nothing happened that anyone could call a national epidemic emergency. In Germany, no event worthy of the term “pandemic” occurred, and yet a lockdown was imposed and sustained – unique in human history –, and continues to be sustained despite the presence of officially sanctioned ‘effective vaccines’ available to all Germans. Across the northern hemisphere, lockdowns threaten yet again, despite ‘vaccines’ promoted by their manufacturers as 95% effective, and despite all-cause-mortality figures that are beginning to show humanity has never been in any danger. This should of course re-beg the question:

What is going on?

Perhaps virology is correct and the bio-chemical things we call viruses are pathogenic. Perhaps SARS-CoV-2 is one of them. Perhaps it was indeed invented in a lab in Wuhan as a gain-of-function bioweapon, and released into the world for some nefarious reason. If so, on the evidence touched on above, SARS-CoV-2 is not a very impressive weapon or virus, manufactured or otherwise, except as a tool to build fear and elicit mass compliance. Or perhaps its highly expensive gain-of-function powers will reveal themselves in due course.

Or maybe the lockdowns are working. Does their relentlessly touted efficacy explain Germany’s slightly falling mortality rates these last two years? Well, if the data presented by the Swedish guest were similarly accurate, then no; Sweden has seen no significant change in all-cause mortality, either.

Many in conspiracy-theory circles call the ‘vaccines’ “kill shots”. I am aware of no robust epidemiological evidence they are, though data is steadily coming to light that strongly suggests they might be, to some currently unknowable extent (more on this below.) I remind readers that the swine-flu vaccine of 1976 was withdrawn after 25 deaths occurred that were associated with the vaccine. Back then, Big Pharma et al. did not have quite the control of the media it has today. We are at tens of thousands of vaccine-related deaths in the US according to their VAERs database, yet still the Biden regime pushes on with mandates. Germany has been ‘vaccinating’ its population since spring; very little has happened to all-cause mortality as a result, except for an above-average uptick through September, which may be sustained through October. Germany is about six months in to its ‘vaccination’ programme. Perhaps the vaccines’ lethality will reveal itself in due course. Perhaps not. Perhaps that particular conspiracy theory is wrong.

I have at this blog nailed my colours firmly to the conspiracy-theory interpretation of what’s going on. My rough definition of conspiracy is, “breaking eggs to make omelettes, while keeping secret which eggs are to be broken”. As such, in this instance as always, the conspirators believe, in their way, they are doing some form of God’s work; i.e., it is ‘right’ to make whatever omelette is being made – a cleaner world? –, even if the eggs sacrificed would vehemently disagree. I have never claimed to know in any detail globalist goals or methods, nor have I claimed to know how many (tenuously) affiliated groups are cooperating, nor what difficult inter- and intra-group tensions beset them. I have also always been of the view that modernity is at an advanced stage of historical decadence, and that this rot – which is a natural part of historical development – has driven the conspirators to make their (desperate) move: crudely, to subject western civilisation to a controlled demolition, then reap the benefits thereof. Having an obviously senile president of the nation said to be the most powerful on earth is but one manifestation of this historical rot, and thus also of the desperation I assert is driving on the so-called ‘elites’.

But just like an all-cause mortality curve is far smoother averaged out over 5 years than over a single season, so my efforts here even out towards better explanations over time (I assert). The material I’ve published on my blog regarding c19 is fairly bumpy as I pursue various musings to see where they lead. My daily thoughts and conversations are more turbulent still, as I react, sometimes very emotionally, to the vicissitudes of the news. But I do try to sort the wheat from the chaff as time goes by. Confronted by an information pool as corrupted as modernity’s, this is a lengthy process. Figuring out with any certainty what we don’t know we don’t know is notoriously difficult, as is ascertaining how relevant this invisible, inaccessible information is. Which is why I promote humility as the only way to travel. It is also why I am determinedly, passionately against all manifestations of groupthink.

Now I’m going to add climate change to the crazy mix I’ve been compiling here these past months, but by way of demonstrating the value of being open about one’s ignorance. This factor – identifying and acknowledging ignorance – is vital to combatting groupthink, conspiracy, and incompetence, and to exposing the danger of placing ‘experts’ on pedestals and trusting everything they say without question. It is also vital in exposing the dangers of not listening to those experts, as to a host of other intractable challenges that attend civilisation and specialisation. Being honest about our ignorance is so vital, in fact, that it is almost impossible to overstate it, however ‘expert’ we feel we are. 

On to anthropogenic climate change. Carbon dioxide is said to be a “greenhouse gas”. Right now, according to DuckDuckGo, there are 413.67 molecules of CO2 in the air for every million molecules of air that are not CO2. By my maths, that means CO2 represents 0.00414% of earth’s air. I further understand CO2 absorbs heat in the form of outgoing long-wave radiation (OLR), and re-emits it after having absorbed a certain amount. I assume this re-emission of heat energy occurs in all directions, not just earthwards. The height above ground a molecule of CO2 is situated will determine, by my thinking, what percentage of that energy finds its way back to earth.

So far, so non-controversial.

But how does a gas that occupies but 0.004% of earth’s air absorb and re-emit heat energy in sufficient amounts to drive climate change as earth’s most effective “greenhouse gas”? Were I to build a greenhouse, I would use glass like other people do. I would not rely on the air – now richer in CO2 by 0.39% more than last year – even knowing that a ‘consensus’ of scientists report, repeatedly, how dangerously effective CO2 is at warming our planet’s biosphere. An air greenhouse would just suck. So how is CO2 the entire planet’s greenhouse? (I’m leaving out other greenhouse gases, like methane, for the sake of brevity.)

I suspect billions would be outraged by such a simplistic line of enquiry, but my point is not to convince anyone of anything other than the importance of abandoning all pretence of knowing everything, an act of honest humility which fosters an atmosphere of mutual discovery, regardless of what that the truth turns out to be.

Dear passionate defenders of earth’s climate: I have been a vegan for almost a decade, gave up my career in an energy-utility company in 2011 in protest against nuclear power, and live as modestly as I can. My position is that one should err on the side of caution; surely knowing I am ignorant of so much demands such caution. Because I have neither the time nor desire to become an expert climatologist, I try to adapt my behaviours such that my impact on the environment is as benign as possible. However, in my own case, it is consumerism, perpetual economic growth and the absurd power of international corporations I see as root causes of this planet’s ills. And yet these are natural consequences that have emerged, fairly predictably, from the soil of civilisational progress. (Feel free to interpret “progress” in whichever way you choose.)

But regardless of my ignorance, I absolutely refuse to not criticise ‘experts’ and the ‘powerful’, to not question them and their ‘consensus’, their mandates, their claims. I do so in a spirit of honest inquiry. There’s a story about a naked emperor we all know and love that beautifully captures the ability of ignorance – depicted as a child in the story – to cut through any expert’s vanity and pride. We all love that story, but today many of us welcome censoring critics of the official covid19 narrative. 

Why? What’s going on here?

Obligatory trust is an oxymoron

Why on earth should I trust any multinational pharmaceutical corporation? In fact, because “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”, I refuse to trust any large agglomeration of power, period. It’s unwise, systemically, for any group to have that much power. People are people, after all. We are obviously not mature enough, psychologically, to handle it, as Lord Acton’s famous saying, slightly misquoted a few lines above, implies. And yet despite this cultural wisdom, so familiar to all of us, it appears we are being mandated to trust Big Pharma; being an “anti-vaxxer” is akin to terrorism, which is illegal. Is criticising or doubting Big Pharma motives and medicines now being made de facto illegal, or at least socially reprehensible? How is this state of affairs not ringing alarm bells in everyone? Because of PR and advertising? How can anything be beyond criticism? Or, in more diluted form: Why should the types of criticism permitted be dictated by the recipient of that criticism? We would never grant such power to each other; why do we grant it to the (already) very powerful?

I choose to think for myself, to resist the influence of groupthink. That seems the healthier way to be, even though it can be socially isolating. I am instantly suspicious of anyone telling me to obey blindly, for any reason whatsoever, particularly for the ‘public good’. Being told to obey ‘authority’, or ‘expertise’, or ‘the science’, however insidiously that instruction is delivered, is precisely how totalitarianism begins. Who can demonstrate clearly, beyond reasonable doubt, that totalitarianism is not currently being installed in as many countries as possible by some collection of wannabe global tyrants? Why are such suspicions so angrily dismissed as lunacy? “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”

There’s no such thing as “unnatural”; there is only nature. One of humanity’s most enduringly hubristic notions is that it is somehow outside nature looking in, ‘scientifically’, ‘objectively’, ‘neutrally’. It is a vanity to which we noble beasts continue to cling. But regardless of our enduring vanity, nothing can be outside nature. I do believe, however, that hierarchical systems, natural as they are,  ‘built’ or ‘developed’ or ‘designed’ by historical processes to steadily accumulate power, are unhealthy. I perceive the madness that has gripped much of humanity – a humanity now living in obedient fear of something as mundane as infecting other people – as the visible symptom of an historical bifurcation point born of the unhealthiness of rigidly hierarchical systems of power … hierarchies of power that must, as they repeatedly do, tend strongly towards totalitarianism as a function of their nature. To repeat: “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” How many deaths can be attributed to the tyrannical tendencies of those who have pursued power since human history began? Do we honestly believe we have bested tyranny with the likes of the BBC and CNN subjecting governments and multinational corporations to ‘objective’ questioning all across the world? Where is the balanced reporting on c19?

And yet despite all of the above, whose logic I still confidently share with you here, those charts presented on Friday 22 October hit me hard. Exactly how caught up in the insanity I see unfolding around me have I been? Is this entire Corona Circus of the Absurd a big fat nothing burger? (In that hysterically inflated nothing burger, I include the conspiring that is clearly underway at a grand scale.) People are suffering horribly, children in their millions coldly mutated into germaphobes by bureaucratic diktat, then subjected, against all logic and evidence, to an experimental gene treatment relabelled ‘vaccine’ … because profit? Billions of humans have been finessed by skilled public-relations “nudgers”, behavioural programmers and NLP experts into a state of perpetual fear on the winds of a vastly over-inflated nothing burger? For financial gain alone? Could it be so grubby? Is humanity that unimaginative? Could the profit motive alone undergird the push towards global totalitarianism simply because the current Powers That Be prefer things basically as they are, just so they can enjoy ever more of what they enjoy? 

I am offended by how unromantic that would be if true. And I am troubled that that offends me. I have attributed to the globalists a dark and erroneous (negative) nobility, a narcissistic noblesse oblige, a romantic urging towards a mechanical beauty they, dysfunctionally, want to create on earth. If it’s all for money … well, that would be something else entirely.

Is there no population-control agenda in the mix here? Why would the pharmaceutical industry risk a poorly developed set of vaccines, rushed to market in record time, for short-term gain but long-term loss of trust? That strikes me as utterly devoid of any wisdom, intelligence, cunning. It would be mere thuggish greed with no thought for tomorrow.

Such musings may well be an accurate reflection of what’s going on: a frenzied wildfire of groupthink, or groupfeel. And the powers coaxing that fear-frenzy to a global climax are no more or less mad than the rest of us. We are suffering an orgy of collective insanity, and, like fish bound together by the ocean of consciousness we are, we are hurled turbulently this way and that, as if one entity.

Or, if there is a population-control agenda, is it failing miserably? Or is The New Normal – global totalitarianism installed around the new pseudo illegality of infection? – designed to smother humanity’s procreational urges so thoroughly that populations will start to decline precipitously over coming decades? Or are the excess mortality spikes currently reported in the US, UK, Germany and elsewhere – spikes not averaged out and adjusted demographically as in the charts that inspired this article – in fact indicative of a dangerous set of ‘vaccines’ slowly beginning to reveal their ‘side-effects’? It would, after all, be a plan doomed to quick failure if the jabs killed millions within days of injection, while the unvaccinated lived merrily on. No mass-media power would be sufficient to keep such a scenario hidden. If the jabs were indeed designed as “kill shots”, it would have to be in some boiling-frogs manner, a strategy slow and insidious enough to escape easy detection. (Some doctors analysing ‘vaccine’ contents have calculated that up to a third are merely saline solutions, for example.)

I’ve never been persuaded by ‘kill shot” arguments, this despite the likes of Dr Luc Montagnier, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Mike Yeadon, Dr Sucharit Bakhdi, and countless lawyers across the globe, propounding such assessments. Their need to warn the world is clearly authentic; they would not lightly risk their reputations, or establishment opprobrium. But the logic of the notion itself does not convince me entirely. That said, I acknowledge my ignorance and keep open all possible explanations for what is unfolding globally. Global affairs are so unnerving – with nascent fascism now on display in France, Italy, Israel, and Australia –, it’s likely the full explanation of the c19 phenomenon is equally unnerving.

So much uncertainty after all this time, analysis, pondering and discussion! The only things I’m confident of are that the official narrative is carefully deceptive and that history rhymes, with civilisation itself composed of systemic qualities that can only repeatedly lead to such bifurcation points. 

So much detail remains to be properly established: What are the true injection rates of the planet’s national populations? What, exactly, is in the various ‘vaccines’? Why are the ‘vaccine’ ingredients not public knowledge? Does SARS-CoV-2 exist as advertised? How many people died solely of covid19? Is covid19 a new, tightly defined illness, or a generic label stuck on to a too-wide range of familiar symptoms? Where did influenza go? What is a pandemic, exactly, and who should be granted the power to announce one? 

These are just a few of the key questions groupthink prevents us from healthily and effectively discussing. Authority and expertise want dominion of these things, but have shown themselves to be very poorly equipped to handle matters of such global importance. They are all too human, all too subject to the weaknesses of the human ego: pride, ambition, greed, fear, groupthink.

I yearn for a system of widely distributed power balances that prevents, by its very composition, power accumulation. Right now, groupthink stands between humanity and wanting something healthier. The current dominant system of inexorable power accumulation towards global tyranny depends for its continued existence on our obedient compliance. Groupthink serves that dependency.

Groupthink. That’s the problem, folks. Groupthink is the soil in which tyranny takes root and blooms. Groupthink is unscientific, anti-life, and cowardly. Groupthink is virus, super-spreader, and medium of infection all at once. The Powers That Be manipulate groupthink like maestros of the dark arts, but fail to notice how susceptible they themselves are to its mist-covered swamps and seductive self-delusions. 

On and on the circus of history’s madness goes. Where it stops, nobody knows.

I think we need more abandon. We need to be more honest with ourselves and each other, more immediate, and then learn how to cope with each of our truths, our authenticity, our ugliness, our beauty. We are too afraid, too timid, too polite, too sensitive, proud, defensive, too allergic to robust community, to honesty, to ‘failure’, to abandonment. 

We need more abandon.

Can we learn to fall backwards, with abandon, into the waiting wilds of chance and discover, fearfully, excitedly, hopefully, whether we can fly on our own without the strings of the powerful keeping us safely netted in some cage of their design? Do we dare help to build a world which encourages true maturity in every individual, with maximum freedom to be as we are culturally expected, nascent in the air we breathe, while accepting full adult responsibility for the choices we make? Can we outgrow our cultural fear of death? Can we uproot our addiction to authority, its dark charm, its promise of eternal safety proffered so tantalisingly, just on the other side of defeating this current terror. Ok, just on the other side of that current terror. Well, perhaps there’s another terror lurking around the next corner…

Tyrannical authority is as addicted to obedience as the obedient are addicted to tyrannical authority. It is a symbiosis, a death trap. Isn’t the way out of this trap the abandon we need to let go of the fears that hold us back, that keep us firmly secured in authority’s embrace? Perhaps we should start looking each other in the eyes and share what we feel. Perhaps we should listen to the other side. Perhaps we should take that risk and see what happens. 

We’re going to die one way or the other.

Go abandon!

Austria’s Herbert Kickl exposes government’s corona lies

[Herbert Kickl is leader of Austria’s FPÖ party (“Freedom Party of Austria”), the third largest in that country. Below is my translation of his speech at a press conference on 22 October 2021. My translation has evened out much of the repetition common to free-flowing speech, to make the written text flow more speedily and smoothly. In other words, the translation is fairly free aesthetically, but tightly loyal to the original in meaning.]

Austrian federal government goes on the rampage

The reason for today’s press conference is what I call the Austrian federal government’s recent rampage, but first and foremost the rampages by the Federal Chancellor and the Minister of Health. Rampages in our country against freedom and human dignity under the guise of public-health policy. I use the term “rampage” deliberately. I could also say that this is a frontal attack on the fundamental rights and freedoms of the entire population, especially on the unvaccinated.

What fundamental rights and freedoms are being attacked here? The right to individual freedom, the right to physical integrity, the right to work and the right not to be discriminated against. All of it is being trampled on by Mr Schallenberg and Mr Mückstein, to force free people, who have chosen not to take an experimental vaccine, onto its needle. In the end, that’s what we are witness to; a brutal regime of mandatory vaccination being established in Austria.

It is nothing more than mandatory vaccination

It doesn’t matter whether we are now talking about the package of measures called “3G” in the workplace [Geimpft (vaccinated), Genesen (recovered), Getestet (tested): in Germanic countries, entry to work, businesses, events, etc. (it varies from country to country) is permitted only if you can demonstrate you are one of those three things], or whether we’re talking about continued progression along the “step-by-step plan” by two further steps, levels 4 and 5: It is nothing more than mandatory vaccination, even if the Austrian federal government is too cowardly to call it by its right name. I put it to you: What kind of sadistic person do you have to be to subject unvaccinated, healthy, symptomless people to mandatory testing, every day, just so that they can go to work, so that they can feed themselves and their families, so that they can earn money to cover their living expenses, so that they can pay taxes to the state, so that they can pay their social-security contributions from which, among other things, our health system is financed?

To subject these unvaccinated, symptomless, healthy people to a compulsory test that is deliberately designed so that many of them cannot even fulfil it, is an act of political cynicism. I have been travelling around the country a lot in the last few days, talking to the people concerned. They explain their situations to me in palpable despair. Their despair at the problems they face from the government’s implementation makes a deep impression. The worst thing about it is that this is precisely the situation the government desires. This so-called alternative of the third G [Gestestet (tested)] is designed in such a way that it is simply inaccessible to many people.

An act of cynicism, an act of blackmail

It is a pure act of cynicism when you consider, for example, the problems faced by shift workers who have irregular work schedules that change every week. They cannot adapt to test-facility opening hours, and such facilities are not even available in more rural areas. When you consider people who often have to drive 20 or 30 kilometres to the nearest test facility, when you consider people who start work so early that nothing is open and finish so late everything is closed, you see that a very, very sinister game is being played here, played on the backs of the population. This is what Mr Mückstein means when he says testing will be made inconvenient, and when Mr Schallenberg says that things will get uncomfortable for the unvaccinated.

What is happening here, in fact, is nothing more than an act of blackmail. Get vaccinated or lose your job. That is the truth behind this regime: 3G in the workplace. I ask you: How cold do you have to be, what kind of a heartless doctor, to disallow unvaccinated, symptomless, healthy people, in this level 4 situation, from visiting their loved ones in the nursing home, for example, from visiting them in an old people’s home, when you know perfectly well these old people suffer from loneliness more than anyone else? You know they need closeness and affection. How cold and heartless do you have to be to set up something like that for level 4?

Bottom-of-the-barrel people treat others like work slaves

And what a bottom-of-the-barrel character you have to be to blackmail healthy, unvaccinated, symptomless people into getting vaccinated by telling them that, for level 4, ”You’re only allowed to have a family member visit your children, acquaintances or friends in hospital if they are vaccinated.” Imagine a car accident, or anything of that severity, and a family member of yours ends up in hospital. We’re dealing with a government that tells them, “If you’re not vaccinated, then you can’t visit them.” This is scraping the bottom of the barrel at its very worst, ladies and gentlemen.

Allow me to ask you something else: What kind of human being do you have to be to treat unvaccinated, healthy and symptomless people – here I’m talking about lockdown for the unvaccinated – almost like work slaves. You are granted the right to go to work, granted the right to pay taxes. Maybe you’re allowed to go to the supermarket, but that’s it. Otherwise you’re locked up. That’s what awaits us in level 5 of the government’s emergency plans.

Is vaccination effective, or not?

Then listen to the explanations as to why all these measures are apparently required. There’s Governor Schützenhöfer. Admittedly, he’s not the brightest candle on the cake, but the explanation he gave is grotesque: He said: “We will not allow the unvaccinated to infect the vaccinated.” Only to say two sentences later, “Only vaccination protects.” Which is it? Governor Schützenhöfer: Which is it? Is vaccination effective, or not?

And the other explanations that have been presented are almost as weak. The second version is that we are to protect the healthy unvaccinated from the vaccinated, from the “fully immunised”. Excuse me? What does fully immunised mean then? It makes no sense. The third version is that you protect the healthy from the healthy by locking them up. Do you not see how absurd, how deranged the whole thing is, the circus that’s underway in our country?

Useless and counterproductive health policy

Ladies and gentlemen, what we are witnessing is constitutionally and morally indefensible. It is deeply reprehensible, and furthermore, completely useless as health policy. It is completely useless health policy, not to mention counterproductive. And we must not forget that all these attacks are not only directed against the wholly unvaccinated, they are also directed against all those who only have a first vaccination but do not want the second “jab”. It is also directed against those who have had two vaccinations and are now hesitating about taking the third. And it is also directed against all those who have recovered and whose reprieve – as I like to call it – granted them by the government, has expired. And that is a very, very large number of people.

Now I will explain why the federal government is doing this. The federal government has an enormous problem. With this government, all those who have pushed the Corona measures in unison with and in support of them over the past months have this problem too. And this problem is called: They are trapped in a dead end.

The plan was to make the greatest possible profit from the crisis

The plan was quite simple. First: You spread fear and panic. That done, you go out and try to herd people into this vaccination experiment so that, later, you can present yourself as the saviour and garner the greatest possible political profit. The problem is that reality does not obey government propaganda. Reality cannot obey a redemption script certain parties penned for themselves. Reality, in fact, works the other way around. Reality supports critics of the script penned by the ÖVP, the Greens and the SPÖ. The true findings are quite different; this vaccine therapy, or “vaccination” as it is called, is not a game changer. Nothing like it. The game-changer story is fake. It is a clear untruth. Yet another on the government’s appalling record of untruths.

Second: Vaccination works, but doesn’t work well enough. You can read about this in the relevant scientific publications. Third – and this is the crucial point: We do not have a pandemic of the unvaccinated. What we have is a major deficit in the effectiveness of the vaccination. And that is why the vaccinated also belong to the group that I call “the deceived” of this government, in connection with its corona policy. And anyone who continues to rely entirely on vaccination, as this government does, those who continue to propagate vaccination as a panacea to the pandemic, are committing a continuing fraud against their own population. This policy will lead us into a health disaster.

The numbers expose government failure

Let’s take a look at a few numbers together. We’ll start with infection rates. The number of so-called ‘cases’ one year ago on 22.10.2020 was 21,835. Today, the 22.10.2021, we have 36,298 cases. That’s significantly more this year, even though we know only unvaccinated people are currently being tested. And the government is deliberately, I say deliberately and knowingly, drawing the wrong conclusion from this data, that we are dealing with a pandemic of the unvaccinated, and building their scapegoat strategy on that. No doubt they will admit their error long after the fact.

Let’s turn to the number of hospitalisations: One year ago, on 22.10.2020, 841 people were hospitalised, and 161 were in intensive care. This makes a total of 1,002 hospitalised. Today, on 22.10.2021: 795 people in hospital, with 220 in intensive care: a total of 1,015. This means that the total number of covid patients in hospitals has increased slightly and that we have seen a significant increase in the number of intensive care patients since last year.

Numbers have worsened after vaccination

And what is the difference between then and now? Ladies and gentlemen, what is the difference? The difference is that in the meantime between 62 and 65 percent of the population, the vaccine-eligible population, is “fully immunised”. That is the difference. One year ago, not a single person in Austria had been vaccinated. Now, common sense tells us that in light of a continuing “full immunisation” programme, this data, the infection numbers, just like the hospitalisation numbers, should actually be declining. They should be declining, but the opposite is true.

I know the government is saying: It’s the unvaccinated. This is the pandemic of the unvaccinated. But that’s not true either. What we are seeing is something quite different. For that you have to examine the number of so-called “vaccine breakthroughs”. Again, this is a trivialising term; vaccine breakthroughs are supposed to suggest that this phenomenon is an exception and not a mass phenomenon. So here, too, there is deliberate language manipulation. Let’s take a closer look at this. In the last four calendar weeks, that is weeks 38 to 41, there were 30,270 symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases. So, those are the vaccine breakthroughs. 30,270. Of those 30,270, 10,189 are fully vaccinated. That's 33.66 percent, and that's across all age groups.

Vaccine breakthroughs in older people: predominantly vaccinated

Now we turn to the high-risk group, the 60+. These are the people for whom the government always said vaccination must be particularly thorough, these are the highly vulnerable people. Here we have a proportion of fully vaccinated people in these vaccine breakthroughs of 65 percent. 65 percent; that’s close to two-thirds of this group. And this despite the fact that we have the highest vaccination rate of all in this age group. There we have reached a vaccination rate of well over 80, almost 90 percent. There should really be no more vaccination breakthroughs at all, if vaccination protects as well as the government repeatedly claims.

These figures do not come from the Freedom Party of Austria, but from the health agency, the federal government, the AGES. And the AGES itself says something very important about these figures: it tells us vaccine breakthroughs are being reported, but we can be confident that nowhere close to all breakthroughs are reported. This phenomenon is called “underreporting”. This means we have to assume that the number of actual breakthroughs is significantly higher. And there is something else. You should also know that only those who have been vaccinated and infected twice, and who also develop symptoms, are recorded as vaccine breakthroughs.

International scientific findings are ignored

So people who have the virus but no symptoms are not counted as a breakthrough. This means that you can add a considerable number of people. Only then you can clearly see how ineffective this vaccination is. And all of this completely confirms what the CDC announced in August of this year after investigating the Massachusetts cluster. You can read about it on the CDC’s homepage. They investigated the outbreak there in fine detail and reported that fully vaccinated people can still be infected, and that vaccinated infected people are just as infectious as unvaccinated people. That is the current state of knowledge of the most important health authority in the world. But this fact is completely ignored by the Austrian federal government.

Mr Schallenberg and Mr Mückstein act as if none of these facts exist. Instead of taking these findings into account, an apartheid system, a caste system I would almost say, is being enforced in Austrian society, in which the lowest of the lowest castes is the unvaccinated. They are denigrated and disenfranchised without justification. This is public-health policy in Austria in 2021, entirely evidence free.

Israel: More and more clusters and diseases despite vaccination

Ladies and gentlemen, not long ago I pointed out in a press conference that we can see from the example of Israel that a high vaccination rate offers no protection against high infection rates. I discussed Israel referencing their scientists’ statements – which you can read in Science – to demonstrate that of the high hospitalisation rates, which include particularly severe and critical progressions, a high percentage so affected are double vaccinated. It was not so long ago that I made this announcement to you in a press conference. This data comes from August of this year, in Israel. It is precisely this development that is now catching up with us.

Israel was just a few months ahead. What has already happened there is now coming to us. The number of clusters of the fully-immunised is constantly growing. You know what it’s like: bus trips of some senior-citizens group, in which only vaccinated people are included, and yet a cluster occurs. They’re finding more and more cases of this kind as the vaccine breakthroughs increase. And, of course, the number of hospitalisations and severe disease progressions are also increasing.

There is no science behind the claim that vaccination makes illnesses milder

I already know people will say: “Yes, yes, but the severe progressions and death rates are down in the double vaccinated.” I would like to hear what the primary source for this claim is. I would like to know. Perhaps you know? What is the primary source for this claim, made repeatedly by our political leaders? What studies back this up? I would really like to know! And the second thing is: Which studies tell us that people are better protected from severe disease progression by vaccination than by appropriate drug treatment? Which studies back that idea up? I would like to hear about them. 

I believe these studies do not exist, ladies and gentlemen.

And because we shouldn’t talk about Israel alone, we should also look at Singapore. A very recent example: Singapore has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, well over 80 percent. But Singapore is currently rushing headlong into a fourth wave; the infection rates there are going through the roof. I can quote Alex Cook, an expert on infection models at the University of Singapore: ”Singapore shows that even high vaccination rates don’t help that much.” So we’re seeing this sort of thing in Singapore, too. And in Denmark, a country where they said they would let people go about freely because the vaccination rate is so high; there, too, the numbers are going up. You see the same thing in Germany. The Robert Koch Institute recently published some data: 60+ [age group]: 55 percent of those who fall ill are double vaccinated. In the Robert Koch Institute’s weekly report, they find around 100,000 vaccine breakthroughs in just one week. The Robert Koch Institute itself is now talking about an overestimation of vaccine effectiveness.

Without any measures, Sweden is better off than Austria

It’s very interesting, what’s happening here. You’ll understand that I’m happy that in another country – which has now disappeared from the radar a bit – the development there is a very, very positive one. I’m talking about Sweden. They took a completely different path from the very start and have a similar proportion of fully-vaccinated people in the total population as Austria. If you look at their current figures, they have 29 people in intensive care as of 22.10. In Austria, as I said, there are 220. If you look at the mortality figures, since 1 July 2021 we have 332 deaths in Sweden and 480 in Austria.

In Sweden, mere suggestions to the population have been in force since 29 September. In our country, the federal government is interfering with a programme of injustice, in which fundamental rights and freedoms are trampled underfoot, and unvaccinated people are stigmatised as scapegoats. Ladies and gentlemen, all this means that while vaccination has some effect, it is by no means the game changer that can end this pandemic.

Has the government always known about low vaccine efficacy?

Vaccination is far less effective than claimed, and is effective for far less time than claimed. And this fact won’t change when, after the third jab, they get a fourth and a fifth and a sixth. The fundamental problem will remain. I believe the Austrian government knows this. If you look at the fact that 41 or 42 million doses were ordered for 2022 and 2023 and do the maths on that figure, you come to the conclusion that you can actually vaccinate seven million Austrians three times a year. They must have already known that the effectiveness lasts a few months at most.

There’s no victory to be had by following this strategy. At the same time, we have a growing side-effects or vaccine-damage scandal. Incidentally, here too we also have the phenomenon of underreporting. Not every event that should be reported is being reported, and by a significant margin. It frightens me when I talk to internists who tell me, for example, that the number of myocarditis cases, especially among young vaccinated people, is very high. This is actually an alarming development, which should immediately lead to an end of the vaccination programme in this age group.

Number of deaths from vaccination damage will increase

The number of deaths by vaccination will also continue to rise. This, too, is something that is completely taboo, about which we hardly hear or read anything. And, of course, we continue to face this problem of medium- and long-term health consequences, where frightening results in connection with tumour growth have now come to public attention, i.e. where there is quite obviously a connection between vaccination and tumour growth.

So, ladies and gentlemen, there is no pandemic of the unvaccinated. Anyone making that claim is spreading government propaganda. The government needs it to be true because it builds all its horrors on top of that claim. What we actually see is an ineffective vaccine and thus rapid spread of the virus among and through the vaccinated. That is the problem we face. That is the real problem. And I don’t blame the vaccinated here. The vaccinated are people who feel protected because of what the government tells them. They are people lulled into a feeling of safety by statements from the Minister of Health, as from all those who have participated in this campaign.

People are being deceived by the government

The vaccinated have been deceived. Deceived , lied to and lulled into a false sense of security. The mendacity continues to this day. This fact is particularly reprehensible. You only have to look at the core claims made in the government’s current vaccination campaigns. The government, in concert with the Red Cross, is running a major vaccination campaign. In addition to the coercive regime being rolled out, this campaign is, as it were, an auxiliary strategy for manipulating people into participating in this vaccination experiment.

So let’s take a look at the core messages from these vaccination campaigns. People are being told – funded by their own tax money by the way – that vaccination will make the pandemic go away. That is one of the posters from the campaigns. Its slogan reads: "So that the pandemic will pass". Hogwash and lies!

Untruths are propagated in garish ads

People are also told that if they get vaccinated, older people will no longer be infected by younger people and children. That’s in those malicious commercials, where we see old people in front of a microphone saying: “Now my grandchildren can finally come and visit me again.” There is no evidence supporting this ad, either.

People are being told as part this vaccination campaign that full protection is provided after the second vaccination. Not even the pharmaceutical companies makes this claim. And yet the Austrian government, in concert with the Red Cross, makes exactly this claim in their vaccination campaign. People are being told that if they don’t get vaccinated, they will get sick. As if there were no symptomless disease progressions. As if there were no T-cell immunity. As if there were no cross-immunity.

Young people are misled about the current legal situation

Yet another message from these vaccination campaigns is evidence free, and particularly ‘creative’ in catching the attention of the young. The campaign aims to exploit young people’s need for entertainment, in the form of discos and clubs. The government misinforms the young by telling them: “You can only get into a club if you’re vaccinated.” That’s not actually the current legal position, but on the poster we see, “Everybody went to the club but Irene, who says ‘vaccination gives you migraines’." That is classic misinformation. This messaging does not accurately depict the current state of the law. What this poster claims is not true.

Unscrupulous and criminal

There are other such examples. “Everyone went to the club but Jochen. He hasn’t been jabbed." Ladies and gentlemen, this is evidence-free manipulation of one’s own population to drive people onto the needle. I think it is disgraceful behaviour. It is unscrupulous and criminal.

It is for this reason that we are filing a complaint with the Federal Office for Safety in Health Care in accordance with paragraph 6 of the Medicines Act. Paragraph 6 of the Medicines Act concerns deception. If what is being disseminated here by means of the vaccination campaigns is not determined to be misleading, when the floodgates will be opened for every form of manipulative misinformation in the field of medicine and vaccination.

Health-budget cuts during humanity’s ‘deadliest’ pandemic

Ladies and gentlemen, the government’s strategy is leading us into disaster. I predict the following: We will crash into a fourth wave. Cases will rise dramatically and the health-care system will face huge difficulties. One reason for this is that it has been cut to the bone and not upgraded these last two years … one and a half years. Please think about that. Cuts in the health budget and not a single intensive-care bed left, despite a pandemic that is allegedly the biggest humanity has ever faced.

Who is responsible for this? And then you get into a situation where a few hundred intensive-care patients cause a modern society to topple over, leading to fundamental rights and freedoms being eliminated in that country. Where have we arrived? Where are we, ladies and gentlemen? This is a total failure! And all this simply because the government continues to rely on vaccination as a panacea.

Public menaces who have human lives on their conscience

Anyone who fails to change course now is a reckless danger to public health. Those who fail in this regard will have human lives on their conscience. I choose my words carefully here. They will deliberately divide society. Whoever fails to change course now will be trampling on fundamental rights and freedoms. Such people will lead our country into the next lockdown. A lockdown not only for the unvaccinated – that will be of no use – but also for the vaccinated. That’s where this will end. And with that we have the next attack on prosperity in this country, which generations have built up and which is now being put at risk by an irresponsible and stubbornly closed-minded federal government.

WHO Director: Vaccination will not end pandemic

Ladies and gentlemen, I suspect the European Director of the WHO won’t be labelled a tinfoil-hat wearer, not even our government would do that. He is Dr Hans Kluge. This particular Director of Health of the WHO said the following: Vaccination will not end the pandemic. Governments need to change their strategy to deal with the spread of the virus.

So what is our government doing? Our government is doing the exact opposite. Our government is betting the farm on vaccination. They risk a reckless gamble, with the population’s health, fundamental rights and freedoms on the line.

The Freedom Party of Austria call for a Plan B

What we Freedom Party members want is the immediate implementation of a Plan B. A Plan B without reprisals. 

Our Plan B has the following essential points. Firstly, an immediate end to any kind of compulsory vaccination. There must be no disadvantage, no reprisals for anyone who does not want to undergo vaccination, for whatever reason. Those who want to be vaccinated should do so. Preferably after detailed consultation with their doctor on the basis of their own medical history. That would be the sensible approach. But not at the supermarket checkout, not on a vaccination bus in front of the school. Not in front of a disco at night, like when whalers used to “shanghai” drunk sailors in the harbour pub. This is similar to what is done now with vaccination, when they try to entice young people outside discos.

Immediate use of medication to aid the infected

The second item is: Immediate use of medication for the infected. Immediate use of medication to prevent severe disease progression. Ladies and gentlemen, you know that existing medicines have been used successfully against covid19 for a long time, that new medicines are being tested and developed. Using these medicines has a major advantage: There’s no need to vaccinate the whole population. Medicines are targeted at those people who have an infection and have been diagnosed with a disease. This means we don't have to expose the entire population to the risk of side effects. That is a huge plus, especially when we know that, statistically speaking, large parts of the population under 60 have zero risk of a severe course of the disease, including death.

If you argue that medication doesn’t work or that you absolutely have to vaccinate: please, ladies and gentlemen, HIV was not fought with vaccination. HIV is fought with medication. This is so important to me, because our government has staked its lot on the claim – I’m referring to those manipulative vaccination campaigns – that only vaccination can protect us. That’s just not true. We know that covid19 is easily treatable with medication. We also know that if these drugs are administered early on, we can prevent severe disease progression and significantly reduce mortality. We know that if we administer these drugs early, we can prevent severe cases, reduce mortality, reduce hospitalisations, prevent overloading vaccination units, that we can prevent all the negative effects currently being triggered.

We know more about administering medication than about third-dose vaccination

You are probably aware that one of 2021’s most read scientific publications is by Professor Peter McCullough. It is an overview of the drugs administered in connection with the fight against covid19. This is in the US, but there are other studies on all these drugs. There are scientific publications and there is real-world experience. And that is much, much more than we can say of the third jab. We don’t have rich experience to draw on here. We don’t have that at all. The crucial point is that these drugs are administered at an early stage and not only in hospital. Then it is too late. Then we find ourselves in the middle of a severe progression.

You also know that American medical associations have established a drug regimen. And there are very, very good doctors in Austria, as in other countries of the European Union, who have adapted this course of medication to European conditions. The main thing is that you do not need intravenous treatments, and you do not need house calls from doctors; you can basically handle everything with tablets. It would be enormously liberating if this course of drugs were applied. So that is one of our central demands, to immediately introduce these drug regimens and launch a broad information campaign to the population, telling them that this is possible, and to promote this form of therapy appropriately.

Record and research population immunity

Ladies and gentlemen, another element of our Plan B is the detection of antibodies throughout the population. This should in fact be a matter of course for a decent health policy; it is incredibly positive news for people to know they themselves are actually better protected from any infection by an immunity they could never attain via vaccination. Sadly, this just doesn’t fit government strategy.

That’s why they also claimed: “Immunity from defeating a disease is over after six months.” That’s a whopper! There is no medical evidence natural immunity lasts only six months. But if we did things differently, people would realise that it can be advantageous to have already been infected, because then you have long-lasting immunity. But then the government would be stuck with all those vaccine doses, a troublesome outcome that obviously has to be prevented at all costs.

Another essential element of Plan B is that vaccinated people are also tested, if relevant symptoms present. Otherwise, we can’t compile a comprehensive dataset.

Solidarity among all those deceived by the government

Ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, the Freedom Party of Austria believes there must be solidarity among all those who have been deceived by the government in connection with its corona policy. And this solidarity of the deceived is the exact opposite of the societal division Schallenberg and Mückstein promote.

To repeat: the deceived include the unvaccinated, who are now being scapegoated without any evidence, and who are being vilified and disenfranchised. The deceived include those who have recovered, who are told that their natural immunity only applies for a few months after they have been in quarantine, then they have get vaccinated. The deceived include those who had an asymptomatic progression, who have antibodies but have did not quarantine. That makes no sense whatsoever. They have also been deceived.

The deceived are also the vaccinated

The deceived are also the vaccinated, simply because they have been led to believe that after two jabs they would be safe, that there is no longer any danger to themselves and others. And no one mentions side effects, they don’t even happen! They are mentioned in every advertisement for sore throat tablets, but not when the government promotes these gene vaccines. Then you hear nothing about dangerous risks and side effects.

We want to foster this solidarity politically. We are fighting for it. Therefore, at the next opportunity, we will table be a motion of no confidence in the Minister of Health. We are preparing a ministerial indictment against Mückstein, just as we did against his predecessor, Anschober. I have already mentioned that we will file a complaint with the Federal Office for Safety in Health Care because of misleading information in connection with all these vaccinations. And I believe that the point will be reached again where the Freedom Party will also bring its protest to the streets.

The quality of time is debt penitence

Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And weak men create hard times. – G. Micheal Hopf, Those Who Remain

Any judges, even those sitting at the European Court of Justice or wherever else, would have the whole world against them, were they to decide to be honest and expose what is going on. To rule correctly, they would in certain circumstances have many against them who want to be vaccinated, which makes matters harder still. Not to mention people who have already been vaccinated but do not want to learn what’s in the vaccine and discover they made a mistake. And all others involved are legally liable, so don’t want to find out either. With every passing day, as more vaccinations occur and lockdown measures and powers are extended, the number of judges prepared to risk raising their voice decreases. The guilt that these people have heaped upon themselves can no longer be atoned for within their lifetimes.  – Holger Fischer, German lawyer*

We have to mean it.

Any system can be brought into crisis. Resolution comes either in the form of collapse to lower complexity, or transformation to higher complexity. And while history doesn’t repeat, it does rhyme, and surely reaps what it sows. How could it be any other way. When it comes to the potential transformation of human culture via crisis, debt mounts and mounts as inertia resists. Consequently, cultures tend to accumulate unfathomably large debt loads as needed change is resolutely ignored.

The question is why we modern humans refuse so determinedly to accommodate this simple and obvious fact of life, despite having at our fingertips extraordinary amounts of information. I believe it is because we are children, deliberately kept children by other children who believe they are gods.

Because we have lost our way down neon-lit paths of comfort and convenience, deeply habituated ourselves to them by all manner of collective and individual self-deceptions, history’s correction will be sharp. But now matter how great they are, no matter how ignored, we will repay our debts because debts cannot go unpaid – uncorrected – forever. Systems self-correct, or are corrected, in the end. Each of us is responsible for our unique contribution to All That Is.

Free will is sacred. Penitence can be no mere tactic, however desperate the situation; it has to flow untrammelled and earnest from the soul. It can be no fad, no Next Best Thing, no titillating consumer item. We have to mean it. To mean it, we have to accept what we are. “Know thyself” is our calling, our duty. We have reneged on that sacred duty more often than we care to learn and the debt on our failing has come due. It can only be paid in the coin of penitence.

Debt repayment, in the sense I mean here, becomes wisdom through penitence if we mean it. Know thyself; understand your part in the whole that is God. To this end – which is no end but an ever evolving process – the courage to learn what love and intimacy are is essential. Though the detail appears infinite and we are wont to fear the devil in that detail – and then hesitate indefinitely –, the simple truth is that we exist to learn how to love … how to become love. And because Self and Other are simply two notions that unite All That Is into the co-creativity of Being, love is as ‘outward’ as it is ‘inward’. I have come to understand love as an emanating state of being – we might call it true health – that is as unconditional as sunshine.

Consciousness – reality, God, All That Is – is richer and more complex than we could hope to appreciate. Humanity – modernity anyway – stands at its foothills wholly unaware of the size of the mountain it is just beginning to raise its eyes to see, the mountain of which it is an inextricable, co-creative part. Historically, it could not be more exciting. One way or the other, we will move on, health will reassert its authority, correction is happening. The healthiest way through is courage, precisely the courage required to do true penitence. There is no avoiding this rite of passage.

My posts of recent weeks have been an odd mix, but for a reason. They represent one component of my way of self-exposure, of disclosure, of penitence, while also acting as a kind of journal of my perspective on humanity’s most important historical moment. And though carefully written as always, my attention to writerly detail is meant to serve transparency, not to conceal the (so-called) real me.

For me, honesty is as sacred as free will. Employed by a mid-sized multinational corporation for years, I suffered. The office politics, the ambitions, the recalcitrance, the hollowness, ate at me. I quit my job in 2011, followed my heart and ruined my career. This ‘noble’ act caused suffering to my family. The suffering I caused taught me, painfully, that principles are tricksy things. This correction taught me, in turn, that flexibility is vital, but that humility must be part of everything we do. Without humility, moral flexibility can manifest as cynical opportunism. Without humility, we close ourselves off to the new, refuse to learn we are wrong.

But for all I’ve learned and preached, I am still judgemental, still angry at The Powers That Be. My heart and mind know how interconnected everything is, but I judge others anyway. I am a human being after all. When I write about “us”, “we” and “humanity” as children, as infantilised, I genuinely include myself as a fully involved member. We are one interconnected entity of unique perspectives, each as ‘important’ as the other. I know this to be true because I also know we don’t properly understand importance and success. The measures we primarily use – status via money and property accumulation, historical impact, fame – are almost entirely misleading. It is how we learn to love that counts. 

I have dedicated my life to learning what love is and can report it is a long and winding road! There is far more road ahead than there is behind me.

Earlier this year, washing dishes at the kitchen sink, my rage at the evil I see unfolding all around exploded, and I speared it up at God. The response was immediate: “Have I not guided you to where you need to be?” My rage instantly dissipated on hearing those words in the corner of my mind. 

(It’s worth noting that much of what I have received from God is tinged with the most exquisite, loving, joyful humour, even in reprimand.)

To provide a little background on why I am where I am: I have been shown and have experienced physical miracles that leave me in no doubt at all – and I am by nature doggedly skeptical – that there is only God. As a rule, I do not publicise these details; they prove nothing to anyone but me. The strangest things happen to me, but I am their recipient, not their cause so cannot replicate them. 

For example, I end some of my posts with the line “Let all that is not rooted in truth and love wither and fall away.” It came to me – was given to me – during a particularly powerful, heart-chakra-centred kundalini event. As such, I understand the words as having come from God and feel obliged to share them, in case they prove useful to someone. 

Another example from maybe 10 years ago: My first kundalini event – I didn’t learn about kundalini until 2014 so had no idea what the feelings of ecstatic joy shooting up my spine were – happened in a dream where a tall, elegant man with bright brown eyes said to me, “Never forget: we are becoming one.” It’s up to me to apply my understanding of this and other instructions to my life, using my free will and wisdom, such as they are.

Of course all these experiences affect me deeply. They have germinated in me an irresistible urge to share what I am, what I dare to claim I know. I do not promote what I post on Econosophy anywhere, so reach a very small audience. But seeing as we don’t understand success and importance, I simply share as honestly as I can, and let fate do with my work as it will. It is of the utmost importance to me to protect what I publish here from any possible transformation into – or interpretation as – some kind of consumer item.

Cultural evolution isn’t up to me; it’s up to all of us, jointly, individually: unique entities, as one, rich in diversity. What I post here is but one part of my efforts, though all are aimed at inviting people to honour the sanctity of free will, to notice the corrosive nature of fear, and to explore the liberating yet dutiful nature of unconditional love. I share all of it with that love, and keep my expectations as low as my protesting ego can manage.

* Holger Fischer uses the word “Schuld” in his final sentence of the quote above. In English, it can mean either “debt” or “guilt”. I hope you can see how these words’ meanings blur in the quote’s context, but also generally. This fusion of the two English words within “Schuld” underpins some of the thinking in this article.

Ernst Wolff talk at (fringes of) Davos

[My translation]

US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt once said, “In politics, nothing happens by chance. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” When we look back over what has transpired in the last year and a half, this quote becomes particularly alarming. Can it really be true that everything we’ve seen really was planned? 

I want to state this clearly right at the start: I cannot produce any definitive proof of a plan, for example in the form of verified documents. But after having intensively followed the events of the last 18 months, I am compelled to say that there is an overwhelming number of signs and clues pointing in precisely this direction. Today, I would like to talk about them and their ramifications.

The situation we currently find ourselves in is unique in history. Never before has such a large percentage of humanity been subjected to such a coercive global regime as now. And never before have so many measures been enacted that appear – at first glance – so confusing, at times so nonsensical, and just as often contradictory. 

Officially, we are confronted with the most serious health crisis there ever was. But the measures enacted in response have not improved the situation. Rather, they have continually made it worse. Every doctor could confirm today that the health of the majority of humanity is worse than before the crisis. And even from the perspective of those who enacted the measures, the results are shambolic. The allegedly threatening “fourth wave” and pronouncements demanding third, fourth and fifth injections reveal that all previous measures have failed utterly in their objective. 

And this is far from the whole story.

We are also confronted, as a direct consequence of the lockdowns, with a severe global economic crisis. Production is slowing in every corner of the world, the logistics industry is on its knees, supply chains are broken, harvests are failing, and we face food and – critically important to a number of industries – semiconductor shortages. 

But here too we see these problems not being addressed and solved. Instead, we see their exacerbation and proliferation via further measures and the threat of yet more restrictions. A recent example: In China, the world’s third largest port was closed because of a single port worker who tested positive. Or in New Zealand: Last week, five million people we placed under lockdown because one single 58 year old tested positive.

Another crisis impacts the middle classes, who are by a large margin responsible for most employment world wide, as well as the source of most government tax revenue. The middle classes, thanks to ceaselessly fomented uncertainty and the continuous introduction of new regulations, are having their backs pressed ever harder against the wall, week by week. This is the deepest crisis they have ever faced.

But all this is still far from the whole story.

We are also in the midst of a rapid increase in global inflation, particularly in raw materials, production prices, and food. And here too we see no corrective responses; the opposite is true. The money faucet is kept open, indeed, the flow is accelerating. States and central banks have poured almost $20 trillion into global money circuits, and there appears to be no end in sight. The IMF – the most powerful financial organisation in the world – is printing $650 billion dollars this coming Monday in SDRs (special drawing rights), the most it has ever generated.

The social situation is no better. Just one example: In the US – the world’s largest economy – four million people are threatened with forced eviction because they cannot pay their rent or mortgage. More than ten times that number – remember, we’re talking about the wealthiest economy in the world – cannot feed themselves from their income. And that which the deliberate destruction of the economy and accelerating inflation have not achieved has been left to our politicians: dividing the people at an unprecedented scale.

And now, perhaps as the cherry on the top of this heaped cake, we witness the USA deliberately abscond from Afghanistan. The Taliban have been allowed to inherit military equipment worth $20 billion: one complete air force and 11 air-force support stations, which will with absolute certainty trigger the next massive refugee crisis.

Why? That’s the question on everyone’s lips. Why have measures been taken across the planet that bring in their wake one disaster after the other, sinking humanity ever deeper into crisis, rather than lifting it from its suffering?

To answer this question, we have to ask two additional questions: Whose vested interests are served by this global agenda? Who profits from it?

The answer to both questions is clear. The largest beneficiary of the current crisis and the most important power player behind the scenes is the digital-financial complex: a sort of interest group headed by the largest IT companies and financial concerns of our time. Among those largest IT companies are Apple, Alphabet (Google’s holding company), Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook. The market value of these five companies alone currently stands at an unimaginable $9.1 trillion. By way of comparison, the combined GDP of France, Germany and Italy totals $8.6 trillion. In addition to these large financial companies, we have the financial giants: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity. They are all significantly involved in all major IT players, and not only that. These four alone currently manage funds totalling $22.6 trillion. By way of comparison, the combined 2020 GDP of the EU’s 28 member countries was $15.7 trillion.

But it isn’t just the monstrous financial might of the digital-financial complex that gives it so much power. Let’s first take a look at the IT companies. They don’t only have great market power themselves, they also control hundreds of thousands of other companies by controlling how they digitise. This means they have continual access to those companies’ data flows. The IT industry is nothing other than a tumour that, over the course of recent years, has metastasised in all branches of the economy and made them dependent upon it. It now controls them completely.

The financial powers look no different. They control stakes in all large companies worldwide and can move any market anywhere in any direction they choose. The largest of their number, BlackRock, possesses a data-analysis system (“Aladdin”), now more than 40 years old, which represents the largest source of financial data the world has ever seen. With this data, BlockRock advises the world’s largest central banks from behind the scenes: the Federal Reserve and the ECB. It should be clear from the enormous advantage “Aladdin” gives BlackRock, who depends on whom. 

We are thus looking at an historically unique mixture of accumulated financial power connected to discretionary power over an unimaginably comprehensive data pool. From the beginning of the crisis, this combination has helped these companies to grow as never before. And not only that, the rate of growth continues to accelerate. In the last quarter alone – April, May and June 2021 – these companies have recorded the largest profits in their histories. 

In view of these facts, we don’t need much imagination to conclude that the digital-financial complex is the centre of power around which everything else revolves. The digital-financial complex stands far above all governments and can, at any time it chooses, force any cabinet on earth to its knees, and make it compliant. 

But we must now examine the methods used by the digital-financial complex since the crisis began, for it looks at first glance as if it is destroying the very ground beneath it, and from which it profits. A couple of examples: Should the digital-financial complex destroy the middle class, it would destroy its own life source; the middles classes pay the most taxes and create the most jobs. And if, additionally, it drives inflation ever higher, it would then be damaging itself too. And if it causes increasing social unrest through extremes of inequality, it poisons the soil that sustains its business. 

These are reasonable objections. But they fail to account for reality as it is.

Reality looks much more like this: The digital-financial complex has no other option than to do precisely what it is currently doing. What we are witness to is not some agenda typed out at someone’s desk that details how to accumulate yet more money and power, and then, finally, to lean back and enjoy its pleasures in peace. What we are witnessing is a terrible act of desperation, likely the largest in human history. Its roots lie in the harsh fact that the system on which the digital-financial complex depends can no longer be sustained with methods that were successful the past. In fact, this complex had been face to face with its own demise as long ago as the 2007-8 financial crisis. Had governments at that time not mobilised enormous sums of money, had they not instructed central banks to create even greater amounts out of thin air, the system would have collapsed. And yet the rescue was short lived. The amount of money needed grew and grew over the course of the next 12 years, interest rates had to be lowered again and again. In other words, the system had to be made more and more unstable. This vector cannot be sustained indefinitely.

Last year, its time was up.

In March 2020, the next collapse was imminent. It was postponed again, though for the last possible time, by a power move involving lowering rates to zero and injecting trillions – not billions – of dollars. However, the act brought into being a wholly new situation, qualitatively speaking. Kicking the can down the road again would require driving interest rates into negative territory; a move that would destroy the current banking system. Banks cannot survive over the long term on negative interest rates. In other words, another kick of the can using the same strategy will not happen. One might, at most, inject trillions upon trillions of dollars more, but with the result that inflation – already alarmingly overheated – would accelerate into hyperinflation.

The situation in which the digital-financial system finds itself, then, is a choice between financial collapse, or hyperinflation. In other words, the total devaluation of money. That means we find ourselves in an historical moment where the digital-financial complex, [trapped] in the framework of the current system, can only choose between two different modes of collapse. 

What to do?

Obviously, the digital-financial complex opted for a new system and installation thereof as a two-pronged strategy. On the one hand, the complex is constructing a new system behind the scenes, out of public sight. On the other and simultaneously, it is using the system’s demise to plunder what remains by any and all means possible. This is exactly what we have been witnessing since March 2020; the deliberate and knowingly initiated destruction of the world economy with the sole objective of self enrichment, while installing a new system with central-bank assistance and in cooperation with the IT giants.

We already know what this new system is going to look like. It involves the complete removal of cash and banks in their current form, and the introduction of digital central-bank money. The final goal appears to be that each one of us will have but one single account over which all transactions will be registered. And this account will no longer be hosted at a commercial bank, but at the central bank.

The background of this plan is as follows. Digital central-bank money is programmable. Because central banks can create unlimited amounts of money out of nothing, one could in fact introduce negative interest rates without destroying the system. But this is not the only property of digital central-bank money. It would enable the state to monitor all transactions, to assign each of us different tax rates, as well as charge us with customised penalties. The state could, in certain circumstances, hand out money with different expiry dates and force us to spend certain amounts of it within certain timeframes. It could also hand out money for specific purposes, command us to spend particular amounts for specific ends in specific regions. But above all, the state would be able to disconnect every one of us from all payment streams with simple mouse click. In other words, financially deactivate us.

Digital central-bank money would be the most effective tool of social control ever to have existed in human history, and thus no more or less than the installation of an all-encompassing dictatorship brought into being by means of a new money system. 

But the whole enterprise has an enormous problem: the foreseeable resistance of the people. We can be certain that a large percentage of humanity will simply not accept such disempowerment; introduction of digital central-bank money would lead to massive disruption and unrest. And it is exactly this factor that led the digital-financial complex to not choose the gradual, incremental introduction of digital central-bank money. They opted for the exact opposite: to cause unrest themselves by throwing societies into chaos, and then presenting digital central-bank money as the great solution, the means by which we can afford a universal basic income.

If you think this is some wild conspiracy theory conjured out of thin air, please recall precisely what we have experienced over the last 18 months. Under the pretext of going to war against a sickness, terrible, irreparable damage to health and economy has been wrought whose full consequences we have only just begun to feel. Meanwhile, the digital-financial complex works 24/7 to exacerbate the damage done. In parallel, social divisions are systematically deepened by driving new wedges between societies over and over again. All this leads us, purposefully, in one single direction: social unrest, followed by civil war … across the planet.

And all of it, according to all the information I have analysed, is so desired.

We are currently subjected to measures of every conceivable form, each designed to cause the greatest possible social chaos, so that, at the pinnacle of this chaos, we are to be presented with the panacea called universal basic income, which will transform maximal chaos into maximal control.

There is, it should also be pointed out, a second reason – as understood by the powerful – why a universal basic income must be installed. We find ourselves in the middle of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The coming years will bring the destruction of millions upon millions of jobs, all replaced by artificial intelligence; millions of consumers will no longer be able to consume as before. Demand for consumer products will collapse at an accelerating rate. And because the system is driven by consumption, the powerful must, to keep it going, arrest this downward spiral. This can only be accomplished by handing out money to the jobless. 

We can see that what we have experienced over the past 18 months, and continue to experience, is following a plan. This plan is essentially the deconstruction of the current system to the benefit of the elites, the creation of maximal economic and social chaos and the installation of a new system under the pretext of wanting to provide humanitarian aid.

By the way, you can read about this plan in two books – The Fourth Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset – by Klaus Schwab, whose World Economic Forum plays a pivotal role in this agenda. In the last 50 years, the WEF has succeeded in becoming the most important control centre of the digital-financial complex, initially by connecting business leaders, later politicians, and later still media creators and royal families, and also, in the 90s, defining their direction and focus.

We know today that, since 1992, the Global Leaders of Tomorrow, and since 2005 the Young Global Leaders, have been given a systematic and increasingly detailed education, and that it is precisely people from their number who operate the levers of power through this period. Whether that be Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, or Jack Marr from IT; whether BlackRock boss Larry Fink, IMF boss Kristalina Georgieva, or ex-Bank of England governor Mark Carney from the financial world; or whether Emanuel Macron, Sebastian Kurz, or Angela Merkel from politics, they were all either educated by the WEF, or sit on its steering committees. And it’s not only the 1,300 members of this group of tightly interconnected elites operating levers the world over; since 2012, over 10,000 under 30s – so-called Global Shapers – have been added, brought together by the WEF, and who now exercise their influence on world affairs in keeping with WEF objectives.

If you want to know what this plan looks like, I recommend taking a close look at Klaus Schwab’s works. And for those who still do not believe that everything we have experienced and continue to experience is following a plan, they should note the publication date of Schwab’s The Great Reset: the book appeared on 19 July 2020, and thus not quite four months after the start of the global lockdown. It contains precise instructions on how covid19 should be used to “creatively destroy” – Schwab’s words – and a build a new world. It should be noted that the human image he describes is reminiscent of the darkest aspects of national socialism.

I know all this sounds shocking, like a carefully prepared apocalypse. And indeed, the agenda being pursued here is obviously not only planned, but also almost unequalled in malice and insidiousness. Who could ever have guessed that the world would be brought to the edge of collapse under the pretext of protecting people from a disease? That people’s freedom of travel, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and freedom of opinion would be withdrawn, that 100,000,000 people would be condemned to starvation, and all of it in the name of their alleged protection.

Who could have guessed that a blatant eugenicist by the name of Klaus Schwab would amass sufficient power not only to propagate his horrific vision for the fusion of humanity with artificial intelligence across the planet, but also to drive it forward with the help of tens of thousands? All of this is a profoundly disturbing development we currently live with, under which we all must suffer, and which must surely freeze the blood of every normal thinking and feeling person on earth.

But I come now to the most important message I have today. This historical moment has another dimension, a wholly different aspect, one that should, above all, give us great drive and energy for the demands the future will place on us. The elite plan and Klaus Schwab’s vision are doomed to fail … for several reasons.

The most important of these is that the narrative of the deadly virus that is an existential threat to humanity cannot be sustained indefinitely. We are already seeing how this house of lies is imploding all around us, and how, to keep it upright, ever more absurd arguments and ever more violent defamations are necessary. It is important to note on this point that the severity with which the media go about their daily business is testimony to its weakness, not its strength. Those who must resort to applying ever more pressure, to disseminating ever more grotesque lies – such as the pandemic of the unvaccinated –, who declare healthy people society’s number one danger, or who shut down whole countries due to a single positive test result, do so for the simple reason that they have no arguments left, and in their desperation throw punches blindly in every direction.

It is claimed Abraham Lincoln once said, “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all of the time.” Those words are being proven true today. This has immense significance for us; ironically, it opens what Klaus Schwab calls the window of opportunity, albeit with exactly the opposite dynamic. As a result of their collapsing narrative, the credibility of those who led us into this situation is being buried more deeply day by day. This opens, for all of us, a unique window to initiate a thoroughgoing and comprehensive campaign to expose all lies propagated thus far.

The objective conditions for explaining to people the true background of the alleged pandemic, the world’s real power networks, and the actual dangers we face, were never as positive as now. And these conditions improve by the day; our opponents are forced to tie themselves up in increasingly ineffective lies. And even if the digital-financial complex succeeds in introducing their planned money system, that would not be the end of the world. Their plan requires a comprehensive system of enforcement. Its advocates will have to establish ever stricter price controls, raise the universal basic income again and again, and will be repeatedly forced into increasing inflation, which must in consequence lead to the growing impoverishment of the world’s people. And all this will bring the people into endless conflict with the state and its controllers.

We must be honest with ourselves. We face without doubt very turbulent and dangerous times, but we do hold an historical trump card. Its power lies in the fact that our opponents cannot act on reason; they are mad with greed and lust for power. They are thus compelled to lead themselves into ever more intractable difficulties. This is exactly what we should exploit, and never forget. Our opponents may well possess far more money and property, and on top of that all the world’s weaponry, but their power is based neither on their money, nor on their property, nor on their weaponry. Their power rests entirely on one single factor: ignorance. In other words, it exists only while the majority fails to see through the games the minority plays with them.

As shocking as everything the digital-financial complex and its followers have done in the past 18 months – and continue to do – is, they have manoeuvred themselves into a situation from which they can no longer escape, and because of which they are forced to cross more and more red lines. What that means for all of us is this: All we need to do in this exceptional moment is stay calm, expose their lies, and explain to others little by little why and by whom they’ve had the wool pulled over their eyes. If we succeed in that, and in doing so calmly remember the strength of our arguments, we will not only solve the world’s current problems, we will also accomplish much more than that. We will use humanity’s deepest crisis to take control of history’s reins and guide it towards a truly different future.